<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fall Books Just Released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aperture.org/exposures/?feed=rss2&#038;p=252" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aperture.org/exposures/?p=252</link>
	<description>An Aperture Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 20:10:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: deleted name</title>
		<link>http://www.aperture.org/exposures/?p=252&#038;cpage=1#comment-603</link>
		<dc:creator>deleted name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aperture.org/exposures/?p=252#comment-603</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a comment: why is the print quality of this new &quot;RFK&quot; so appalling compared to the earlier Magum edition?

It looks like every print was &quot;auto-levelled&quot; via Photoshop. The earlier edition was so deft and so beautiful, and this looks horrible.

Shame on those responsible. I can&#039;t believe Paul Fusco signed off on proofs of such low quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a comment: why is the print quality of this new &#8220;RFK&#8221; so appalling compared to the earlier Magum edition?</p>
<p>It looks like every print was &#8220;auto-levelled&#8221; via Photoshop. The earlier edition was so deft and so beautiful, and this looks horrible.</p>
<p>Shame on those responsible. I can&#8217;t believe Paul Fusco signed off on proofs of such low quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
