<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Architecture of Authority in D.C.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aperture.org/exposures/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aperture.org/exposures/?p=2456</link>
	<description>An Aperture Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 20:10:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Brook</title>
		<link>http://www.aperture.org/exposures/?p=2456&#038;cpage=1#comment-5781</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Brook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aperture.org/exposures/?p=2456#comment-5781</guid>
		<description>Ross&#039; work is phenomenal. I am a huge fan, but I am also the harshest of critics. It seems that the cultural importance of Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo were too important to leave out of his &quot;Architecture of Authority&quot; book.

However, I have made the argument that perhaps Ross should have left them out as his images of the two prisons are the loosest of his images and therefore his weakest; compromising the collection as a whole. If that argument interests you, read here:

http://prisonphotography.wordpress.com/2008/12/11/richard-ross-prison-apparatus-and-the-human-touch/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ross&#8217; work is phenomenal. I am a huge fan, but I am also the harshest of critics. It seems that the cultural importance of Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo were too important to leave out of his &#8220;Architecture of Authority&#8221; book.</p>
<p>However, I have made the argument that perhaps Ross should have left them out as his images of the two prisons are the loosest of his images and therefore his weakest; compromising the collection as a whole. If that argument interests you, read here:</p>
<p><a href="http://prisonphotography.wordpress.com/2008/12/11/richard-ross-prison-apparatus-and-the-human-touch/" rel="nofollow">http://prisonphotography.wordpress.com/2008/12/11/richard-ross-prison-apparatus-and-the-human-touch/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
